"Q: Then electricity is, in essence, a flow of electrons?
A: Yes.
Q: You say they are tapped. Where are they tapped from? What is the source of these free electrons?
A: All materials. All matter. All aether.
Q: The electrons of the conductor itself are being passed along, and this is the manifestation of the flow of
electricity?
A: Maybe.
Q: In what sense am I not correct?
A: Limiting concept to "conductor."
"Q: Then electricity is, in essence, a flow of electrons?
A: Yes.
Q: You say they are tapped. Where are they tapped from? What is the source of these free electrons?
A: All materials. All matter. All aether.
Q: The electrons of the conductor itself are being passed along, and this is the manifestation of the flow of
electricity?
A: Maybe.
Q: In what sense am I not correct?
A: Limiting concept to "conductor."
Q: Electrical energy will be present in everything. But in some particular substances, such as those things we call
conductors; the electrical energy is, as you said, collected, trapped and channeled, which then is a useful activity
because it creates light and runs machines and so forth...
A: Primitive.
Q: Okay. It is primitive. We understand that. When electricity moves in what would be considered a superconductor,
how is it different from an ordinary conductor, such as a copper wire?
A: Accelerates flow, thus separating electrons, thus "exciting" process.
Q: What qualities does the superconductor have that contributes to this accelerating of flow?
A: Cycling magnetic pulse.
Q: What creates a cycling magnetic pulse?
A: Matter within gravity vacuum.
Q: How do you create a gravity vacuum?
A: In this case, it is created unintentionally as a by product of superconductivity.
Q: You said that a superconductor separates the electrons, thus exciting the flow. What do you mean by separating?
A: From each other.
Q: How is that different from a normal electric flow?
A: Not as widely separated.
Q: Is this separation of electrons a key to this process?
A: Yes.
Q: What additional conditions or qualities contribute to the separating of electrons?
A: Ask yourself now, what conditions define a superconductor?
Q: (L) What defines a superconductor? (A) Zero resistance. (V) Is that without gravity? (A) No heat. (L) How does one
achieve zero resistance?
A: Artificial construct.
Q: Do you mean that it is an artificial idea, or that the only thing that would have zero resistance would be something
that is artificially constructed.
A: Both.
Q: So, there is no actual possibility for a true superconductor with absolutely zero resistance? But that the resistance
can be reduced to a very low level.
A: Close.
Q: Does cold necessarily have something to do with superconductivity?
A: What conditions exist in outer space?
Q: Well it is VERY cold... (A) It is almost a vacuum. (L) No gravity.
(A) No, there is gravity, but only that. What I think we must ask is what is the relation between superconductivity and
gravity?
Q: There was something mentioned... what was that about aether?
A: Non-material realm of existence.
Q: (L) In other words, consciousness. Okay, you mentioned a cycling magnetic pulse that was an unintentional
byproduct of superconductivity, and something about matter within a gravity vacuum... Could you define a cycling
magnetic pulse?
A: Self explanatory.
Q: You said it was derived from matter within a gravity vacuum. Does that mean that superconductivity creates a
gravity vacuum?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Where? Within the superconductor or outside?
A: Within.
Q: (A) According to what we know, it also creates an electromagnetic vacuum. Is it correct that there is no magnetic
field within the superconductor?
A: We have stated before that these two properties are interwoven.
Q: (L) Electromagnetism and gravity. So, if there is no gravity, there is no electromagnetism. But then where is the
magnetic pulse?
A: Pulse exists outside of gravity vacuum, but within superconductor. Picture a tube structure.
Q: Is the superconducting state within the gravity vacuum or within the em pulse?
A: All inclusive. Normal structure for channeling electron flow within a conductor is a solid "tube," within
superconductor; it is a "hollow" tube structure, thus evidence of vacuum.
Q: Does this hollow tube structure have any bearing on what you described as the separating of electrons?
A: It is a manifestation of same.
Q: So, in order to have a superconductor, one ought to have a temperature similar to the temperature in space, as
well as possibly a chemical construction that is similar to the ambient properties of space, only greatly condensed,
would that be it?
A: Close.
Q: (A) Do they mean there is zero gravity without superconductor? They say a vacuum which means what? No gravity?
A: Within.
Q: (A) No gravity within.
A: Not "no," just far less, and fragmented in nature." - The Wave Series Transcripts
|
|
